Why peepholeLSTMLayer implemented in a tutorial is much slower than built-in lstmlayer?
3 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Why this implementation of peepholeLSTMLayer https://au.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ug/define-custom-recurrent-deep-learning-layer.html is much slower than built-in lstmlayer?
What can be done to speed it up? For example, can it be compiled into a binary code?
0 comentarios
Respuestas (1)
Hiro Yoshino
el 31 de Ag. de 2023
I suppose that is because the implementation of interest is a custom model while the built-in LSTM is optimized for computation.
MATLAB has kept improving its performance over the years (see this). So I guess this is also the case with the buil-in capabilities in MATLAB.
Hope these help you.
1 comentario
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Image Data Workflows en Help Center y File Exchange.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!