verification of the intepretation of a simple code that contains "isequalwithequalnans"

Could you please verify the interpretation of the code

if ~(isequalwithequalnans(a, b) ==1 | isequalwithequalnans(a, c) ==1)

'not ok'

    End

My interpretation is the following

If (a and b) are not equal OR (a and c) are not equal then

“Not ok”

Answer 1

[Andrei Bobrov]

isequalwithequalnans(a,b) | isequalwithequalnans(a,c)

[antonet]

thank you andrei. So my interpretation was correct. Am i right?

[C.J. Harris]

This answer is not correct. Try both this statement and the original statement with inputs of a=2, b=3, c=4.

[Andrei Bobrov]

Sorry! I agree with Chris, thank you Chris. I corrected my answer.

[C.J. Harris]

Maybe I'm missing something here, but this is still not correct. Notice the NOT symbol (~) in the original statement. Your answer is the opposite of the correct answer.

Answer 2

[C.J. Harris]

No, that interpretation is NOT correct.

The statement says if BOTH b and c are different to a then 'Not ok'. Or in other words it is 'ok' as long as either b OR c is equal to a.

[antonet]

thanks. this is actually what i was looking for