K-mean for Wine data set
3 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Hi,
I performed a K-mean algorithm command on the wine data set from UCI respiratory. This dataset contains chemical analysis of 178 wines, derived from three different cultivars. Wine type is based on 13 continuous features.
Here's the command load 'wine_data.txt';
[IDX,C,sumd,D] = kmeans(wine_data,3,... 'start','sample',... 'Replicates',100,... 'maxiter',1000, 'display','final');
The final Best total sum of distances is 2.37069e+06. This result is way far from the reported K-means solution from the literature, which is aournd 18,061. Is the K-mean solution of Matlab stuck in local minima? Please advice. Thanks.
1 comentario
the cyclist
el 27 de Ag. de 2013
For anyone who is interested in helping out on this one, the data set is here: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Wine
Respuestas (4)
Shashank Prasanna
el 27 de Ag. de 2013
Ganesh, what distance metric does the 'literature' use?
The kmeans default is 'sqEuclidean'. You have to make sure you are comparing the same metric. Try changing it to cityblock or any of the other options:
0 comentarios
gheorghe gardu
el 1 de Nov. de 2015
I would like to ask if you could post the Matlab code that you have used ? I would like to thank you in advance.
0 comentarios
Paul Munro
el 21 de Feb. de 2023
The large distance sum you report makes me think that you did not rescale the data. Variable 13 is in the thousands and will overwhelm the effect of the other variables. You will probably get better results if you rescale the variables separately (Z scoring for example).
0 comentarios
Ver también
Productos
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!