ODE45 is taking hours and hours to compute
23 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Bathala Teja
el 13 de Sept. de 2021
Comentada: Bathala Teja
el 14 de Sept. de 2021
I want to solve 27 odes, for that i formed equations with matrices.
First i formed A(27*27 matrix), B(27*27 matrix) and C(25*25 matrix). All three are interms of 'theta'(i used 'sym' for forming A, B, C matrices). Now iam going to use these matrices to form ode eq's and solving using ode45.
Here i gave script after forming A, B, C matrices for some confidentiality.
% A, B, C matrices formed interms of theta
myfun = @(t,y)scriptname(t,y,A,B,C);
% dummy values for tspan and y0
tspan = [0 1];
y0 = zeros(27, 1);
% ode solver
sol = ode45(myfun,tspan,y0);
h = figure;
% plot
plot(sol.x,sol.y(i,:));
function dydt = scriptname(t,y,A,B,C)
Wr = 2*pi*50;
p =2;
% evaluation of C (numerical) with theta = y(27)
Cn = double(subs(C,y(27)));
for i=1:25
I(i,1)=y(i);
end
T1=1/2*p*I'*Cn*I
if t<0.5
T2=0;
else
T2=7.31;
end
V=[cos(Wr*t);
cos(Wr*t+2.*pi/3.);
cos(Wr*t-2.*pi/3.);
zeros(21, 1);
0;
(T1-T2);
y(26)]
% evaluation of A and B (numerical) with theta = y(27)
An = double(subs(A,y(27)));
Bn = double(subs(B,y(27)));
dydt = Bn\V-(An*y);
end
While running the script, it is taking hours and hours(i waited 5-6 hours and stopped compiling) but not giving any result.
I dont know what is wrong with the script.
Can anyone suggest me how to get result quickly.
0 comentarios
Respuesta aceptada
Walter Roberson
el 14 de Sept. de 2021
Pay attention to the fact that the if statement was removed from the code, and that instead the run was split into two pieces that pass in different T2 values. The mathematics used for ode45() is such that if you use two different branches of an if statement in a single call to ode45(), then there is a good chance that your code is wrong, and that you need to stop the integration at the boundary and then resume integration from where you left off.
% A, B, C matrices formed in terms of theta
commonvars = unique([symvar(A), symvar(B), symvar(C)]); %probably just theta
Afun = matlabFunction(A, 'vars', commonvars);
Bfun = matlabFunction(B, 'vars', commonvars);
Cfun = matlabFunction(C, 'vars', commonvars);
tspan1 = [0, 0.5]; T2_1 = 0;
tspan2 = [0.5, 1]; T2_2 = 7.31;
myfun1 = @(t,y)scriptname(t, y, T2_1, Afun, Bfun, Cfun);
myfun2 = @(t,y)scriptname(t, y, T2_2, Afun, Bfun, Cfun);
y0_1 = zeros(27, 1);
% ode solver
[t_1, y1] = ode45(myfun1, tspan1, y0_1);
y0_2 = y1(end,:);
[t_2, y2] = ode45(myfun2, tspan2, y0_2);
t = [t_1; t_2];
y = [y1; y2];
h = figure;
% plot
plot(t, y);
function dydt = scriptname(t, y, T2, Afun, Bfun, Cfun)
Wr = 2*pi*50;
p =2;
% evaluation of C (numerical) with theta = y(27)
Cn = Cfun(y(27));
for i=1:25
I(i,1)=y(i);
end
T1=1/2*p*I'*Cn*I
V=[cos(Wr*t);
cos(Wr*t+2.*pi/3.);
cos(Wr*t-2.*pi/3.);
zeros(21, 1);
0;
(T1-T2);
y(26)]
% evaluation of A and B (numerical) with theta = y(27)
An = Afun(y(27));
Bn = Bfun(y(27));
dydt = Bn\V-(An*y);
end
5 comentarios
Walter Roberson
el 14 de Sept. de 2021
I have made a number of small changes to my working copy.
The code has a number of integral() operations that cannot be expected to have closed-form solutions, but MATLAB has to try to integral each of them when it sees int()
You can substitute in vpaintegral() and get through to the creation of the G, L, g matrices.
However at that point you want to matlabFunction() . But matlabFunction() does not support vpaintegral() .
In a recent release, MATLAB added a 'hold' option to int() to get an unevaluated int() form that you could manipuate and later release() . However... matlabFunction() does not handle the 'hold' option either.
You end up having to upgrade the vpaintegral() objects into int() objects. Sadly, that is very time consuming.
You have to understand some of the more obscure parts of the Symbolic Toolbox in order to upgrade the vpaintgral() into int() objects. But doing so is mostly a waste of time as you can predict that very few of the expressions will turn out to have closed form solutions, but upgrading to int() requires that MATLAB spend a lot of time trying to do the integration.
It might perhaps be easier to find all of the vpaintegral() calls and generate matlabFunction for the integrand, emit a wrapper function that does integral(), and then replace the vpaintegral() with a symoblic function reference... I am not sure at the moment that all this can be made to work.
Más respuestas (1)
Jan
el 13 de Sept. de 2021
Symbolic omputations need a lot of time. Can you implement the code numerically?
If the equation to be integrated is stiff, ODE45 tries to reduce the stepsize to mikroskopic values. Use a stiff solver in this case. e.g. ODE23S.
if t<0.5
Remember that Matlab's ODE integrators are designed to handle smooth functions only. Maybe this is a hard jump and the stepsize controller fails to pass this point. The correct way is to stop the integration at such jumps and restart it with the changed parameter.
12 comentarios
Jan
el 14 de Sept. de 2021
@Bathala Teja: The discussion would be much easier, if you post your complete code. Then the conversion to a direct numerical version is most likely easy. As long as the readers are guessing, they can give abstract hints only. If you do not understand these hints, a helpful answer is unlikely.
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Symbolic Math Toolbox en Help Center y File Exchange.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!