In trackerGNN, why is the costOfNonAssignment half of the Assignment Threshold?
1 visualización (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Ozlem Gumuskanat
el 17 de Mzo. de 2022
Comentada: Elad Kivelevitch
el 29 de Abr. de 2022
In trackerGNN, why is the costOfNonAssignment half of the Assignment Threshold?
0 comentarios
Respuesta aceptada
Elad Kivelevitch
el 17 de Mzo. de 2022
Because the penalty for not assigning a detection to a track is applied twice - once for the unassigned detection and once for the unassigned track.
2 comentarios
Elad Kivelevitch
el 29 de Abr. de 2022
It has nothing to do with the choice of assignment algorithm or matrix multiplication. It is just part of the assignment cost. Let's say you have only one track and one detection with a cost of assignment being 20 and cost of non-assignment being 15.
So, the optimal solution is actually gained from assigning the detection to the track, because you incur a cost of 20. If you didn't assign them, the unassigned track would cost you 15 and the unassigned detection would cost you another 15, leading to a total cost of 30.
Because it could be confusing why a cost of 20 is better than a cost of nonassignment of 15 we decided to ask for the 30 and split it in half internally.
Más respuestas (0)
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Tracking and Sensor Fusion en Help Center y File Exchange.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!