Eigenvalue problem optimized with lqsnonlin

6 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Fabio Cavagna
Fabio Cavagna el 3 de Ag. de 2023
Comentada: Matt J el 22 de Oct. de 2024 a las 12:13
Hello everyone,
I have the generalized eigenvalue problem (K-w^2*M)*R = 0 where
K is a 6x6 diagonal matrix whose values are unknown,
M is a 6x6 matrix whose values are known,
w^2 are the eigenvalues (typically called lambda) and they are known through f ( w = 2*pi*f )
R are the eigenvectors
I would like to obtain the diagonal values of K that minimize the difference between f_exact (my values) and f_calc evaluated through iterations.
I tried with lsqnonlin but the f_calc is far from my f_exact.
Does anyone know how to optimize in a better way?
Here's my code:
% M matrix
M = diag([1e3, 1e3, 1e3, 1e5, 1e5, 1e5]);
M(1,4) = 100; M(4,1) = 100; M(1,5) = 150; M(5,1) = 150;
M(2,6) = 10; M(6,2) = 10; M(3,6) = 1; M(6,3) = 1;
M(2,3) = 30; M(3,2) = 30; M(3,5) = 500; M(5,3) = 500;
f_exact = [30, 30, 100, 10, 10, 20]; %lambda = (2*pi*f)^2
K_guess = [1e8, 1e8, 1e8, 1e8, 1e8, 1e8]; %Initial guess
LB = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1];
UB = [1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15];
options = optimoptions('lsqnonlin','FunctionTolerance',1e-16);
K_opt = lsqnonlin(@(K) obj_function(K, M, f_exact),K_guess,LB,UB,options);
%% Check
K_check = diag(K_opt);
[R,L] = eig(K_check,M);
f_calc = diag(sqrt(L)./(2*pi));
function diff = obj_function(K, M, f_exact)
K_mat = diag(K);
[R,L] = eig(K_mat,M);
eig_calc = diag(L);
f_calc = sqrt(eig_calc)./(2*pi)
diff = f_calc - f_exact;
end
  2 comentarios
Torsten
Torsten el 3 de Ag. de 2023
At least you should sort given and calculated eigenvalues before comparing them.
Sam Chak
Sam Chak el 4 de Ag. de 2023
It's good to learn optimization with lqsnonlin. However, in this eigenvalue problem, the algorithm is kind of defeating the purpose because your objective function depends eig() computation itself.
Might as well use eig() directly to find the eigenvalues. You can use eig() for checking the accuracy, but not relying on it to solve the problem.
The logical question is how can the objective function be formulated without eig()?

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Respuesta aceptada

Matt J
Matt J el 3 de Ag. de 2023
Editada: Matt J el 3 de Ag. de 2023
% M matrix
M = diag([1e3, 1e3, 1e3, 1e5, 1e5, 1e5]);
M(1,4) = 100; M(4,1) = 100; M(1,5) = 150; M(5,1) = 150;
M(2,6) = 10; M(6,2) = 10; M(3,6) = 1; M(6,3) = 1;
M(2,3) = 30; M(3,2) = 30; M(3,5) = 500; M(5,3) = 500;
f_exact = [30, 30, 100, 10, 10, 20];
K_guess = ((2*pi*f_exact(:)).^2.*diag(M))'; %<---- better initial guess
LB = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1];
UB = [1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15, 1e15];
options = optimoptions('lsqnonlin','FunctionTolerance',1e-16,'StepTol',1e-16, 'OptimalityTol',1e-12,'MaxFunEvals',inf);
[K_opt,~,res] = lsqnonlin(@(K) obj_function(K, M, f_exact),K_guess,LB,UB,options);
Local minimum possible. lsqnonlin stopped because the final change in the sum of squares relative to its initial value is less than the value of the function tolerance.
%% Check
K_check = diag(K_opt);
[R,L] = eig(K_check,M);
f_calc = diag(sqrt(L)./(2*pi)).';
sort(f_calc) %<---compare sorted
ans = 1×6
9.9997 10.0000 20.0000 30.0000 30.0000 100.0000
sort(f_exact)
ans = 1×6
10 10 20 30 30 100
function diff = obj_function(K, M, f_exact)
K_mat = diag(K);
[R,L] = eig(K_mat,M);
eig_calc = diag(L).'; %<---transpose
f_calc = sqrt(eig_calc)./(2*pi);
diff = sort(f_calc) - sort(f_exact); %<---compare sorted
end
  7 comentarios
Marina
Marina el 22 de Oct. de 2024
Editada: Marina el 22 de Oct. de 2024
Do you have any suggestion on how I can get my K stiffness matrix? with a better exact vs calculated values. Thank you!
Matt J
Matt J el 22 de Oct. de 2024 a las 12:13
I'm afraid not. I have no reason to believe it should work.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (0)

Categorías

Más información sobre Linear Algebra en Help Center y File Exchange.

Productos


Versión

R2019b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by