Validating multi-start fmincon optimization
8 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
I am using fmincon solver for optimizing a nonlinear problem with three design variables. I have ub and lb bounds for the design varibales along with onley one inequality non-linear constraint which is implemented by @nonlcon. I use 10000 diffeerent initial guesses to ensure the coverage of design space. I have to questions: 1- is it sensible to double check the optimal solution with a hybrid surrogateopt–fmincon approach which combines global search followed up by local optimization? I already did this and i obtianed results very close to multi-start fmincon process, however, i wanted to make sure if it makes sense? 2 - in both approch most of the time KKT residual is not close to zero, how necessary is to have KKT residual ot be near zero for a non-convext and non-linear problem with possibel several local minimum. not having KKT residuals at zero implies unrelibale solutions?
4 comentarios
Matt J
el 7 de Abr. de 2025
was found to be in 1-2% difference from output solution from the optimization problem modelled with surrogateopt solver.
I don't see what that tells you about the KKT residual.
Respuestas (1)
Matt J
el 7 de Abr. de 2025
My main Q is that: does make sense to confirm the solutions form fmincon solver with global optimization like surrogateopt?
It can't hurt, and may add some extra confidence, but none of the solvers can be used to definitely determine whether a local optimum has been found. The exitflags are provided to you as an indication of how optimistic the solver is about the termination point being a solution.
0 comentarios
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Surrogate Optimization en Help Center y File Exchange.
Productos
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!