Inverse stationary wavelet transform (iswt) slow compared to stationary wavelet transform?
2 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
I ran an analysis of my code using profile, and found that iswt takes significantly longer than the forward swt (more than a factor of 10). Bior3.3 was the wavelet used, and there were 8 decomposition levels. Any ideas on what accounts for the difference in execution time?
0 comentarios
Respuestas (0)
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Continuous Wavelet Transforms en Help Center y File Exchange.
Productos
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!