Why don't graphics appear for this code?

Why don't graphics appear for this code?
% Variáveis
m = 112.34;
temp = 25;
ISC = 7.8;
VTR = 0.0257;
VT = 0.0257;
VCA = 32.7;
GR = 1000;
G = 700;
% Cálculo do IR
IR = 1000 * (ISC / (2.718*exp(VCA/(m*VTR))-1))
for V = 0:1:VCA
V1 = V*2
%Carcular a potencia máxima para G=1000
P = V1*IR*35
end
figure(1)
h=plot(V1,P);
set(h,'color',rand(1,3),'linewidth',2);
hold on
axis([0 200 0 40])
xlabel('Tensão')
ylabel('Potência')
title('Curva P-V')

 Respuesta aceptada

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 15 de Mzo. de 2011

2 votos

Each time through the loop you replace V1 and P, so at the end of the loop you only have a single point to plot.
Try
V1 = (0:1:VCA).*2; P = V1.*IR.*35;
with no loop.

Más respuestas (3)

Nuno
Nuno el 15 de Mzo. de 2011

0 votos

Why i can´t make loop?

2 comentarios

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
You _can_ do it with a loop, provided that you store the V1 and P value that results from each loop. You aren't doing that now: each time through the loop, you are overwriting the previously calculated value.
Matt Tearle
Matt Tearle el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
What Walter was saying above is that you don't *need* to have a loop -- his solution does the same thing, cleaner and simpler.
As an aside, note that 0:1:VCA will give you whole numbers from 0 up to 32, because VCA is 32.7. That is, the range operator in MATLAB is essentially "<=". Obviously I don't know your intention -- just wanted to make sure you're aware of that.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Nuno
Nuno el 15 de Mzo. de 2011

0 votos

But if i change to V1= 0:0.1:VCA appear error in P=V1.*IR.*35...

2 comentarios

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
Notice I used
V1 = (0:1:VCA).*2
But even without the multiplication by 2, I do not find any obvious error in P=V1.*IR.*35 . What error do you observe?
Matt Tearle
Matt Tearle el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
Works fine for me:
m = 112.34;
temp = 25;
ISC = 7.8;
VTR = 0.0257;
VT = 0.0257;
VCA = 32.7;
GR = 1000;
G = 700;
% Cálculo do IR
IR = 1000 * (ISC / (2.718*exp(VCA/(m*VTR))-1));
V = 0:1:VCA;
V1 = V*2;
%Carcular a potencia máxima para G=1000
P = V1*IR*35;
figure(1)
h=plot(V1,P);
set(h,'color',rand(1,3),'linewidth',2);
hold on
axis([0 200 0 40])
xlabel('Tensão')
ylabel('Potência')
title('Curva P-V')

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Nuno
Nuno el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
Yes, the code works... Thanks! But now i have a new problem...
When i complile de program, the graphs should give a value of voltage (V) up to 32,7 but the value is ~12,5. Why?
Code:
% Variáveis
m = 112.34;
temp = 25;
ISC = 7.8;
VTR = 0.0257;
VT = 0.0257;
VCA = 32.7;
GR = 1000;
G = 700;
% Cálculo do IR
IR = 1000 * (ISC / (2.718*exp(VCA/(m*VTR))-1));
V1 = (0:0.1:VCA);
ICC = ISC * (G/GR);
I = ICC - IR.*(2.718.*exp(V1./(m.*VT))-1);
ICC1 = ISC * ((G+100)/GR);
I1 = ICC1 - IR.*(2.718.*exp(V1./(m.*VT))-1);
ICC2 = ISC * ((G+200)/GR);
I2 = ICC2 - IR.*(2.718.*exp(V1./(m.*VT))-1);
ICC3 = ISC * ((G+300)/GR);
I3 = ICC3 - IR.*(2.718.*exp(V1./(m*VT))-1);
ICC4 = ISC * ((G+400)/GR);
I4 = ICC4 - IR.*(2.718.*exp(V1./(m*VT))-1);
%Carcular a potencia máxima para G=1000
P = V1.*I3;
figure(1)
j=plot(V1,P);
set(j,'color',rand(1,3),'linewidth',2);
hold on
axis([0 40 0 100])
xlabel('Tensão(V)')
ylabel('Potência')
title('Curva P-V')
figure(2)
h=plot(V1,I,V1,I1,V1,I2,V1,I3,V1,I4);
set(h,'color',rand(1,3),'linewidth',2);
hold on
axis([0 40 0 40])
xlabel('Tensão(V)')
ylabel('Corrente')
title('Curva I-V')

7 comentarios

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
The voltage does go up to there, but the axis() call forces all output values below 0 to be discarded.
I do not know what is being calculated (and would not necessarily understand it if you explained).
Question: why are you multiplying those values by 2.718 ? Isn't that just exp(1) ? So why not just add 1 to the value inside the exp() and not do the multiplication?
Nuno
Nuno el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
I calculate the diode current in a photovoltaic circuit.
2.718 is a nepper number and exp() is exponensial...
I can review the calculations...
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
The nepper number that is approximately 2.718 *is* exactly exp(1) .
Nuno
Nuno el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
Ok... Stupid error :(
But gives error if i change to: I = ICC - IR.*(2.718^(V1./(m.*VT))-1);
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 15 de Mzo. de 2011
Use .^ instead of ^
Also, exp(expression) would be clearer than 2.718.^(expression)
Matt Tearle
Matt Tearle el 16 de Mzo. de 2011
And, more importantly, correct. 2.718^x is an inaccurate version of exp(x).
Nuno
Nuno el 16 de Mzo. de 2011
The error is in another count... Thanks for the help...

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Categorías

Más información sobre Mathematics en Centro de ayuda y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Preguntada:

el 15 de Mzo. de 2011

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by