Pause function in matlab for 1 millisecond

Hi,

I need to pause my matlab program at GUI, because I'm using serial communication, but when I use pause command it only allows me to pause it for 0.01 seconds.

pause(0.01) %in seconds

The thing I need, for example:

pause(0.001) %in seconds, but actually doesn't works

Anyone knows how to pause matlab for 1 millisecond? Thanks for read and answer.

Greetings.

[chandan kumar]

Hello there,

First use:

 pause on % to enable pause function

Now you can use pause function:

 pause(x); // delay in seconds (x is non-negative real number)

[Walter Roberson]

Pause is on by default.

On MS Windows, the resolution is only 0.01 seconds and using "pause on" does not change that.

Answer 1

[Jan]

There is an accurate timer in Java, which can be called directly in Matlab:

java.lang.Thread.sleep(duration*1000)  % in mysec!

[Hamid Reza saadati]

thanks a lot

Answer 2

[AndreasDerFuchs]

The attached pauses() matlab function combines the above ideas.

It can pause with an accuracy of 0.03 ms on my PC, without using too much CPU-bandwidth, as opposed to an accuracy of 0.8 ms with java.lang.Thread.sleep(ms), or the even worse accuracy of 15 ms with pause().

I've tested the accuracy with:

pauses(0); ii=1:300; d=ii/12345;
for i=ii;
   t0=tic; pauses(d(i),t0); t(i)=toc(t0);
end;
fprintf('3 sigma accuracy = %.6f ms\n', std(t-d)*3000);

[akin hunerli]

hi Hamid Reza saadati, i have the problem with the pause command working on a guide interface then i realised that we have to add a pause command end of the code.

[Toby Dewhurst]

Works perfectly. Thanks for sharing!

Answer 3

[Daniel Shub]

Getting millisecond timing accuracy is extremely difficult in most programming languages since the underlying clocks are just not that accurate. It really is a question of how much jitter you can tolerate.

That said, the "serial port" tag makes me think you should look at callback functions.

Answer 4

[Andreas Goser]

While Jakob's answer is a correct answer to your specific question, you might want to do something different, as the PAUSE command really stops MATLAB from doing stuff.

Answer 5

[Malcolm Lidierth]

Pause does more than cause a sleep (see the docs) e.g. it flushes the AWT/Swing EDT. The minimum delay will therefore reflect what needs to be done in the background. undocumentedmatlab.com has several relevant posts (see drawnow/pause)

Answer 6

[Jakob Sørensen]

Doesn't work how? And what Matlab version are you using? In R2011b, running Windows 7, I get the following results

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;
Elapsed time is 0.009849 seconds.

Which is reasonably close to 1 ms.

[Jan]

Reasonably close to 1ms?! It is almost 10 times longer.

[Juan]

Hi,

I need 1 millisecond or less... I'm using R2009a and I got this with tic and toc:

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;

Elapsed time is 0.018589 seconds.

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;

Elapsed time is 0.020876 seconds.

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;

Elapsed time is 0.008370 seconds.

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;

Elapsed time is 0.016282 seconds.

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;

Elapsed time is 0.005483 seconds.

>> tic;pause(0.001);toc;

Elapsed time is 0.003235 seconds.

I'm not sure how to use timer objects or serial callback functions to do this delay... Any examples? Thanks for your answers

[Jakob Sørensen]

Jan -> wops, you're right, saw it as three zeros after the dot. Then just ignore my answer :p

[Daniel Shub]

@Juan, can you include some more detail about what you are doing and what you are trying to accomplish. Please don't respond in the comments, but rather edit your question using markup. From your tags I am guessing you have a loop in which you read from the serial port (possibly do something with the data) and then pause, but this is more or less a wild guess.

[Christin]

Juan I am experiencing the exact same problem! I've found that ~0.0156 sec is the fastest "pause" can go. I'd love to do a for-loop at 100Hz but can't another way to do it. If you ever find a solution to this problem please share!

[timo]

Elapsed time is 0.015487 seconds. Wtf

[Walter Roberson]

R2015a on OS-X:

g = @() pause(0.001);
timeit(g, 0)

shows outputs between 0.001255 and 0.001404. (Be sure to use 0 as the second argument or else you end up measuring the time to return the "state" of the timer.)

The result is consistently higher than 1 1/4 millisecond and less than 1 1/2 millisecond in the tests I have done this way. Note that

tic(); pause(0.001); toc()

at the command line is not completely representative due to differences in what is JIT (Just In Time compiled)

Answer 7

[Marcel Kraemer]

Hi Guys,

I had the same problem as you and I couldn't find an answer on the internet. So I tried following solution which works percetly well for me.

function delay(seconds)

% function pause the program
% seconds = delay time in seconds

tic;
while toc < seconds
end

end

Cheers, Marcel

[KnowledgeSeeker]

Thank you Marcel. Works for me too...

Answer 8

[Andreas Sprenger]

Hi,

on a 32bit Windows System you may use a kernel function. It works quite accurate, I've tested it against hardware timer. Unfortunately I haven't found a solution on 64bit Win7. Any hints are welcome.

Cheers

Andreas

Here an example for 32bit Windows:

if ~libisloaded('QPerf')
    % loads kernel functions for time measurement
    loadlibrary ('kernel32.dll', @QueryPerformance, 'alias', 'QPerf')
end

% data structure for QueryPerformance...
Value.LowPart = uint32(0);
Value.HighPart = uint32(0);
QStruct = libstruct('s_ULARGE_INTEGER', Value);

% Get performance of the computer
[xval, QFreq] = calllib('QPerf', 'QueryPerformanceFrequency', QStruct);
Frequency = QFreq.HighPart*2^32 + QFreq.LowPart; 

% Get t0
[~, QCounter] = calllib('QPerf', 'QueryPerformanceCounter', QStruct);
t0 = (QCounter.HighPart*2^32 + QCounter.LowPart) / Frequency * 1000;
 t1 = t0;

% example: wait a second
while t1 - t0 < 1000
  [~, QCounter] = calllib('QPerf', 'QueryPerformanceCounter', QStruct);
  t1 = (QCounter.HighPart*2^32 + QCounter.LowPart) / Frequency * 1000;
end

% -----

function [methodinfo,structs,enuminfo] = QueryPerformance
%This function was generated by the perl file prototypes.pl called from loadlibary.m on Wed Apr  5 19:40:14 2006
%perl options:'win.i -outfile=QueryPerformance

ival={cell(1,0)}; % change 0 to the actual number of functions to preallocate the data.
fcns=struct('name',ival,'calltype',ival,'LHS',ival,'RHS',ival,'alias',ival);
structs=[];enuminfo=[];fcnNum=1;

%  BOOL _stdcall QueryPerformanceCounter(LARGE_INTEGER *); 
fcns.name{fcnNum}='QueryPerformanceCounter'; 
fcns.calltype{fcnNum}='stdcall'; 
fcns.LHS{fcnNum}='int32'; 
fcns.RHS{fcnNum}={'s_ULARGE_INTEGERPtr'};
fcnNum = fcnNum+1;

%  BOOL _stdcall QueryPerformanceFrequency(LARGE_INTEGER *); 
fcns.name{fcnNum}='QueryPerformanceFrequency'; 
fcns.calltype{fcnNum}='stdcall'; 
fcns.LHS{fcnNum}='int32'; 
fcns.RHS{fcnNum}={'s_ULARGE_INTEGERPtr'};
fcnNum = fcnNum+1;

structs.s_ULARGE_INTEGER.packing=8;
structs.s_ULARGE_INTEGER.members=struct('LowPart', 'uint32', 'HighPart', 'uint32');

methodinfo = fcns;

[Andreas Sprenger]

Hi,

searching for a solution on 64bit Matlab I came across a workaround. Edit the prototype and change fcns.calltype from 'stdcall' (most common on 32bit Windows systems) to 'cdecl' (C type declaration). It works both on 32bit and 64bit Matlab systems. On 2013a there is a warning that the loader file will not be supported in future.

Andreas

[Jan]

Please do not post a question in the section for answers. See my new answer...

Answer 9

[Walter Roberson]

The Windows task scheduler runs every 15 ms, so you cannot get 0.001 resolution without resorting to something like busy-wait.

See the extended discussion, with specific tests, at

https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/1887467-why-is-pause-function-so-inaccurate-on-windows#answer_1139927