Borrar filtros
Borrar filtros

How to use cell2mat for specific elements of cell array?

18 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
gsourop
gsourop el 25 de Oct. de 2018
Editada: Stephen23 el 25 de Oct. de 2018
Hi everyone,
I am trying to create a double from specific elements of a cell array. If I have a cell array B, of dimensions 6x5, of which each element contains a double 10x4, such as:
for i = 1 : 6
for j = 1 : 5
A = randn(10,4)
B{i,j} = A;
end
end
I would like to create a big double out of all the rows and first 3 columns of B, and the second and third column of each interior double A (on this 6x3 cell array). Hence, the expected double C that should be a 60x6 matrix. I am using
C = cell2mat(B{:,1:3}(:,[2,3]));
But I get an error. What am I missing here?

Respuesta aceptada

Stephen23
Stephen23 el 25 de Oct. de 2018
Editada: Stephen23 el 25 de Oct. de 2018
C = cell2mat(B(:,1:3));
C = C(:,2:3);
"What am I missing here?"
Several things: firstly, that the B{...} syntax creates a comma-separated list from the contents of the cell array, which in general is not a valid input for cell2mat:
Secondly, that in MATLAB indexing cannot be arbitrarily added on to the end of any other expression, so you will need to use a temporary variable.
  2 comentarios
gsourop
gsourop el 25 de Oct. de 2018
I think that a loop could solve the issue. Is it an efficient way to proceed?
for i =1 : 3
B1 = cell2mat(B(:,i));
B2 = B1(:,[2,3]);
if i == 1
D = B2;
else
D = [D B2]
end
end
Stephen23
Stephen23 el 25 de Oct. de 2018
Editada: Stephen23 el 25 de Oct. de 2018
"Is it an efficient way to proceed?"
Not the way you are doing it, because you expand the array D on each loop iteration, which forces MATLAB to move it in memory. You should preallocate the output array and use indexing:
But ultimately you will just have to test it and find out.
Personally I would not use a loop, simply because it pointlessly obfuscates what you are doing: the time wasted trying to read/understand/maintain/reverse-engineer that loop will likely be much more than any possible gain you might get from runtime efficiency (or not). Unless this really is the slowest part of your code, you should write using the clearest syntax possible (i.e. without a loop, e.g. my answer). Why bother writing nine lines of code just to do the same thing as my two lines? This is not "efficient" coding.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (0)

Categorías

Más información sobre Data Type Conversion en Help Center y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by