Speeding up a for loop

1 visualización (últimos 30 días)
Alex Kozlov
Alex Kozlov el 12 de En. de 2020
Comentada: Alex Kozlov el 13 de En. de 2020
Hi,
I'm trying to speed up processing time of my code.
Can the next code be reduced to be processed using vectorization instead of using a for-loop? I usually manage fine with these things, but here there are some tricky matrix operations.
Give these inputs:
S1 = 5994;
S2 = 88;
S3 = 8;
A = 100*rand(S1,S3)-50;
B = 100*rand(S2,S3)-50;
C = 100*rand(S1,S2)-50;
Const1 = 1.1;
The loop:
for vv=1:size(A,1)
temp1 = A(vv,:)-Const1*B;
temp2 = C(vv,:).*(abs(temp1).^2).';
Sum = Sum + sum(temp2,'all');
end
Sum = Sum/(S1*S3);
  1 comentario
Adam Danz
Adam Danz el 12 de En. de 2020
Editada: Adam Danz el 13 de En. de 2020
I assume Sum is initialized as the following (or something similar), prior to the loop.
Sum = 0;

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Respuesta aceptada

Thiago Henrique Gomes Lobato
Thiago Henrique Gomes Lobato el 12 de En. de 2020
If you don't mind having 3 dimensional arrays something like this can be used
rng(42)
S1 = 5994;
S2 = 88;
S3 = 8;
A = 100*rand(S1,S3)-50;
B = 100*rand(S2,S3)-50;
C = 100*rand(S1,S2)-50;
Const1 = 1.1;
Sum = 0;
tic
for vv=1:size(A,1)
temp1 = A(vv,:)-Const1*B;
temp2 = C(vv,:).*(abs(temp1).^2).';
Sum = Sum + sum(temp2,'all');
end
timeLoop = toc
% Vector alternative
tic
temp1Vec = reshape(A',1,size(A,2),size(A,1) )-Const1*B;
temp2Vec = sum(reshape(C',size(C,2),1,size(C,1)).* ((abs(temp1Vec).^2)) ,'all');
timeVec = toc
SumVec = sum(temp2Vec)/(S1*S3)
Sum = Sum/(S1*S3)
timeLoop =
0.0424
timeVec =
0.0228
SumVec =
6.6553e+03
Sum =
6.6553e+03
For your S1 I get sometimes faster results and some times slower ones, if I increase the S1 size I start to become consistent faster results.
  1 comentario
Alex Kozlov
Alex Kozlov el 13 de En. de 2020
Thanks, that did the trick. I improved the speed further by replacing
((abs(temp1Vec).^2)),'all');
by:
((real(temp1Vec).^2+imag(temp1Vec).^2)),'all');
In the original code, which i couldn't share, temp1 could contain complex numbers.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (1)

Adam Danz
Adam Danz el 12 de En. de 2020
Editada: Adam Danz el 12 de En. de 2020
Idea 1
This single line does the same thing as the 2nd block of your code.
Sum2 = sum(arrayfun(@(i)sum(C(i,:) .* (abs(A(i,:)-Const1*B).^2).','all'), 1:size(A,1)))/(S1*S3);
isequal(Sum,Sum2) % Test that it matches the loop output (it does)
However, it's 0.01sec longer than your loop method.
Idea 2
Even if your loop is condensed by combining the variables, the improvement in speed is barely measurable and it comes at the expense of readability.
Sum2 = 0;
for vv=1:size(A,1)
Sum2 = Sum2 + sum(C(vv,:) .* (abs(A(vv,:)-Const1*B).^2).', 'all');
end
Sum2 = Sum2/(S1*S3);
isequal(Sum,Sum2) % Test that it matches the loop output (it does)

Categorías

Más información sobre Loops and Conditional Statements en Help Center y File Exchange.

Productos


Versión

R2019a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by