How to assign values to an array with broadcasting

Is there any way to do broadcasting while assigning values to an array?
I know how to broadcast a computation:
G = zeros(3)
G + [1 2 3]
ans =
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
But I want to assign the above values to G directly:
G(:,:) = [1 2 3]
Unable to perform assignment because the size of the left side is 3-by-3 and the size of the right side is 1-by-3.
I know how to broadcast a simple scalar value:
G(:) = 1
G =
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
And I realise I could do this instead:
G(:,:) = repmat([1 2 3], 3, 1)
G =
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
But I wondered if there is a simpler way to assign a vector of values to all the rows using automatic broadcasting.
Judging by the answers to this question, I am guess not, but I wanted to check.

 Respuesta aceptada

madhan ravi
madhan ravi el 28 de Jul. de 2020
Editada: madhan ravi el 28 de Jul. de 2020

0 votos

Your way of using repmat() is the easiest way.

9 comentarios

madhan ravi
madhan ravi el 28 de Jul. de 2020
Editada: madhan ravi el 28 de Jul. de 2020
Why not simply
G = zeros(3) + (1:3) % ?
Or
kron(repelem(1,3,1),1:3)
Bill Tubbs
Bill Tubbs el 28 de Jul. de 2020
Editada: Bill Tubbs el 28 de Jul. de 2020
The reason I want to avoid G = zeros(3) + (1:3) is for performance reasons—to avoid the possibility that it destroys the existing memory for G and reallocates it. I'm used to Python where you always do: G[:] = [1,2,3] (assign new values) if G is very big rather than: G = np.repeat([[1, 2, 3]],3,axis=0) (create a new array in memory).
Bill Tubbs
Bill Tubbs el 28 de Jul. de 2020
Editada: Bill Tubbs el 28 de Jul. de 2020
Seems like G = repmat([1 2 3], 3, 1) is the best solution. As far as I can see, none of these methods assign new values directly to the original array without first creating a whole new array of the same size for the right-hand-side (so there is no point in doing G[:,:] = ...). I ran some speed tests with a large G array and the repmat method is the fastest, followed by kron(repelem(n,10,1),1:10). Thanks!
Ah perhaps the implicit expansion:
zeros(3, 1) + (1:3)
Interesting result I just discovered:
G = zeros(500000,10)
is about twice as fast as
G(:) = 0
(for the same size G). So I guess, assignment of new values is slower in MATLAB than building a new array anyway!
madhan ravi
madhan ravi el 28 de Jul. de 2020
And?
Bill Tubbs
Bill Tubbs el 28 de Jul. de 2020
It's surprising* and it means that my idea of avoiding allocating new memory by somehow assigning to the original array probably wouldn't have speeded up the code even if it were possible (* Example: allows a 1.6x speedup in Python).
For any dimension matrix,you can do
X=repmat(fading,20,1)
where fading is a matrix of any size. For me it was fading coefficient matrix
repmat was discussed above. Bill was hoping for something more efficient.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (0)

Categorías

Más información sobre Creating and Concatenating Matrices en Centro de ayuda y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Preguntada:

el 28 de Jul. de 2020

Comentada:

el 8 de Mzo. de 2021

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by