Is it possible to vectorize this?
2 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Omar Ali Muhammed
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
I want to find the most occurring element in the matrix in column wise excluding zeror elements.
e.g if A = [1 2 0 3 4 6; 9 3 4 0 9 5; 4 3 0 5 6 7; 3 7 7 3 0 0;1 1 8 8 4 8; 0 0 0 0 4 2; 0 0 0 0 0 0]'
The result is a cell matrix B
B={[1 2 3 4 6], [9], [4 3 5 6 7],[3 7], [8],[4 2], nan}
So most occurring elements is a cell array.
loops are inefficient for lage matrix.
Thanks in advance....
6 comentarios
Matt J
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
loops are inefficient for lage matrix.
Note that in Matlab, there is no way of populating a cell array that doesn't involve a for-loop (or something the same speed as a for-loop). So, the use of loops in some way will be inevitable.
Scott MacKenzie
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
Editada: Scott MacKenzie
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
Just to clarify, your question says "column wise". Do you mean "row wise"? Your example solution, B, shows the most occurring elements along the rows in A.
The code below avoids a loop and gets close to your goal:
% Assume A is the initial matrix (as in the example)
A(A==0) = NaN;
[~, ~, B] = mode(A,2);
B = B'
If A is your example matrix, then B matches your example result, except for the NaN entries where 0 occurs. Oddly (to me, anyway), you want 0s excluded except in the situation where all elments in a row are 0. In that case, NaN appears as the most occurring element. That doesn't quite add up to me, but that's the logic I see in your example.
Respuesta aceptada
Sean de Wolski
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
Editada: Sean de Wolski
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
A = [1 2 0 3 4 6; 9 3 4 0 9 5; 4 3 0 5 6 7; 3 7 7 3 0 0;1 1 8 8 4 8; 0 0 0 0 4 2; 0 0 0 0 0 0]
B = accumarray(repmat((1:height(A)).',width(A),1),A(:), [],@(x)modeall(nonzeros(x)))
celldisp(B)
function m = modeall(x)
[~,~,m] = mode(x);
if isempty(m{1}) % Handle empty case
m{1} = nan;
end
end
2 comentarios
Más respuestas (2)
Bruno Luong
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
Editada: Bruno Luong
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
NOTE the order of most is sorted with this algorithm:
A = [1 2 0 3 4 6;
9 3 4 0 9 5;
4 3 0 5 6 7;
3 7 7 3 0 0;
1 1 8 8 4 8;
0 0 0 0 4 2;
0 0 0 0 0 0]'
% Algo
[u,~,I] = unique(A);
keep = A ~= 0;
[~,J] = find(keep);
c = accumarray([I(keep),J],1);
[r,c] = find(c == max(c,[],1) & c>0);
B = accumarray(c,r,[size(A,2) 1], @(r) {u(r)})';
celldisp(B)
1 comentario
Bruno Luong
el 28 de Abr. de 2021
Editada: Bruno Luong
el 28 de Abr. de 2021
In case A contains reasonably small integers, the UNIQUE command can be removed and this method can be faster
% I = A; % <= this replace UNIQUE
keep = A ~= 0;
[~,J] = find(keep);
c = accumarray([A(keep),J],1);
[r,c] = find(c == max(c,[],1) & c>0);
B = accumarray(c,r,[size(A,2) 1], @(r) {r})'; % indexing u{r} is no longer needed
Jan
el 27 de Abr. de 2021
mode() handles matrices as inputs also. Only ignoring the zeros is complicated.
For a comparison here the loop method:
A = [1 2 0 3 4 6; 9 3 4 0 9 5; 4 3 0 5 6 7; 3 7 7 3 0 0;1 1 8 8 4 8; 0 0 0 0 4 2; 0 0 0 0 0 0];
C = ModeFull(A.');
celldisp(C)
function C = ModeFull(A)
% Mode along 1st dimension ignoring zeros
n = size(A, 2);
C = cell(1, n);
for k = 1:n
a = A(:, k);
a = a(a ~= 0);
if isempty(a)
C{k} = NaN;
else
x = sort(a);
start = find([true; diff(x) ~= 0]);
freq = zeros(numel(x), 1);
freq(start) = [diff(start); numel(x) + 1 - start(end)];
m = max(freq);
C{k} = x(freq == m).';
end
end
end
Please compare the run time with Sean de Wolski's vectorized approach for your real data.
2 comentarios
Jan
el 28 de Abr. de 2021
Editada: Jan
el 28 de Abr. de 2021
@Bruno Luong: Some timings (i5 mobile, R2018b)
A = randi(50, 1000, 1000);
A(rand(size(A)) < 0.2) = 0;
tic
B = accumarray(repmat((1:size(A, 1)).', size(A, 2), 1), A(:), [], ...
@(x)modeall(nonzeros(x)));
toc
tic; C = BrunosMode(A.'); toc
tic; D = ModeFull(A.'); toc
% Elapsed time is 0.402765 seconds. Sean
% Elapsed time is 0.165996 seconds. Bruno
% Elapsed time is 0.075373 seconds. Jan
This is another example, where the assumption "loops are inefficient for large matrices" do not match the expectations. This was the case before the JIT become powerful in Matlab 6.5 - this was in 2002. But as the "brute clearing header" the rumor of slow loops is still living.
Vectorizing is very efficient, if the data and the operation is suitable and if no huge intermediate data are produced.
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Logical en Help Center y File Exchange.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!