Info

La pregunta está cerrada. Vuélvala a abrir para editarla o responderla.

bvp4c or classical odesolver

1 visualización (últimos 30 días)
Moritz
Moritz el 23 de Jul. de 2013
Cerrada: MATLAB Answer Bot el 20 de Ag. de 2021
Hello,
i solved an initial BVP by the method of lines in the following way:
i=1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i),v(i+1))) + ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-Ax(i));
i=2:N-1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)+0.5*dx).*F(i)...
-(xcen(i)-0.5*dx).*F(i-1)) + 1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-2*Ax(i)+Ax(i-1));
i=N;
dvdt(i)= omega^2/dx*(xcen(end)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i-1),v(i)) - ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i)-Ax(i-1));
Is it better or probably faster to use bvp4c instead ? What are the reasons why i would like to use bvp4c and not the approach i used ?
Any comments are appreciated
Best Wishes
Moritz

Respuestas (0)

La pregunta está cerrada.

Etiquetas

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by