Why do I receive different optimized values by varying the order of nonlinear constraints in FMINCON

1 visualización (últimos 30 días)
I am applying fmincon function on motion optimization of robotic arm. The only constraints that I consider, are the set of nonlinear constraint. The objective and set of constrains are written below.
objective = @(h) h(1)+h(2)+h(3)+h(4)+h(5)+h(6)+h(7)+h(8)+h(9);
subjected to following constraints
  1. Ve(i)=abs[(w(i+1)/2)*h(i)+(q(i+1)-q(i))/h(i)+((w(i)-w(i+1))*h(i))/6] =<400
  2. Jerk(i)= abs[(w(i+1)-w(i))/h(i)]=<240
  3. A(i)= abs[(w(i)/(h(i)))*(t(i+1)-tx) + (w(i+1)/(h(i))) * (tx-t(i))] =<250
I have obtained different optimized values based on the different sequences of constraints (1,2,3). In 1st case I use the sequence (1,2,3) and in 2nd case , constraint’s sequence is (3,1,2). In both cases, different optimization values obtained even though the input values are same in both cases.
Case one results are;
1.7363 2.7841 2.0678 1.4065 0.6189 1.7987 2.4236 1.7065 1.3710
Final Objective: 15.9134
Case second results are;
1.0e+03 *
0.1922 0.3243 0.1647 0.0914 0.0828 0.9730 2.5193 1.8097 -0.0403
Final Objective: 6117.0441
May I know the reason behind this huge variations in the optimized values.
  4 comentarios
dpb
dpb el 27 de Jun. de 2021
Indeed. Also need to investigate It's possible can get "stuck" in local minima.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Respuestas (0)

Categorías

Más información sobre Get Started with Optimization Toolbox en Help Center y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by