Using quadgk inside a loop

5 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
David
David el 15 de Abr. de 2012
How do I get quadgk to work inside a "for" loop?
I'm trying to solve an integral equation coupled with a first order ODE numerically. Therefore I need to evaluate an integral for many different steps of solving the ODE (I'm using the Euler method).
I can't seem to get my code to loop through quadgk which is the problem.
  1 comentario
Richard Brown
Richard Brown el 16 de Abr. de 2012
You need to be a bit more specific about your problem - how about posting what you've tried. Then we can help.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Respuesta aceptada

Mike Hosea
Mike Hosea el 16 de Abr. de 2012
You've got a couple of problems here that jump out at me. One is that your expression for n0 tends to lose precision due to the squaring and subtraction and cancel. Maybe rewrite it as something like n + I/2*(1-sqrt(1-4*n/I)). The second problem is that the integrand decays so rapidly that the quadrature rule does a lot of work trying to resolve it close to the left-end and then wastes a lot of energy on adding up zeros over most of the transformed interval. I suggest breaking this into a couple of pieces:
Q = quadgk(F,3.29e15,1e17,'reltol',1e-6,'abstol',1e-10) + ...
quadgk(F,1e17,inf,'reltol',1e-6,'abstol',1e-20);
The cutoff is fairly arbitrary. It shouldn't be too large. Note here that you probably also want to crank down the absolute tolerance just a little bit on the tail because there's not much area out there to add up. -- Mike

Más respuestas (1)

Mike Hosea
Mike Hosea el 16 de Abr. de 2012
I agree with Richard. We'll probably need to see one of your attempts, but I can take a guess. Most likely you're having trouble with the vectorization of the integrand, and it's probably erroring in mtimes something, telling you about a dimension mismatch. If that's the problem, use ARRAYFUN, e.g. if the integrand is fun(x) but fun isn't vectorized (i.e., needs to be given scalars and will not operate elementwise on an input vector), try
quadgk(@(x)arrayfun(fun,x),a,b)
This works with the new INTEGRAL function as well, and it is probably the way to go, but with INTEGRAL there's another possibility:
integral(fun,a,b,'ArrayValued',true)
Although you might not think of the integrand as returning an array, when the 'ArrayValued' option is true, the integrand is only called with scalar input.

Categorías

Más información sobre Loops and Conditional Statements en Help Center y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by