- When your function calls error have it call error with an error identifier and use verifyError to Verify that the error with that identifier is thrown when the code you're testing gets Exercised.
- Check that an error is thrown by calling verifyError with ?MException as the metaClass input.
Unittest: Verify whether the function prints correct error message
23 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Akshay Jajoo
el 15 de Jul. de 2021
Respondida: Steven Lord
el 16 de Jul. de 2021
Hello all,
I am writing class based unittests, using matlab.unittest.TestCase. In some of my functions, at some conditions, we print error message using the error function. For example:
function ret = myFunc(input1, input2)
if length(unique(input1)) ~= 2 & S_ntream == 2
error("Your input doesn't satisfy minimum unique input requirement")
end
%Other stuff the function will do if it meets the above condition goes here.
end
Now, in my unittests I want to verify that my program is displaying/returning this error message, when it should. I tried using the verifyError method like following. However, the test failed. (I have designed the emv.input1, emv.input2 such that the function will reach the error branch.)
classdef myFunc_Test < matlab.unittest.TestCase
properties(TestParameter)
emv = generateAllInputsForErrorMessageVerification();
end
methods(Test, ParameterCombination = 'sequential')
function testErrorMessages(testCase, emv)
%I have designed the emv.input1, emv.input2 such that the function
%will reach the error branch.
testCase.verifyError(@()myFunc(emv.input1, emv.input2), ... ,
"Your input doesn't satisfy minimum unique input requirement");
end
end
end
Also, using verifyEqual doesn't make sense as myFunc is not "returning" the error message ("Your input....").
Any suggestions on how this can be tested will be appreciated. Thanks in anticipation.
0 comentarios
Respuesta aceptada
Steven Lord
el 16 de Jul. de 2021
You can do this in one of two ways.
testcase = matlab.unittest.TestCase.forInteractiveUse;
testcase.verifyError(@() magic(3)+magic(4), 'MATLAB:sizeDimensionsMustMatch', ...
'Cannot add a 3-by-3 and a 4-by-4')
testcase.verifyError(@() error('Something went wrong'), ?MException)
% Show failing test cases
testcase.verifyError(@() magic(3)+magic(4), 'MATLAB:thisIsTheWrongErrorIdentifier', ...
'Cannot add a 3-by-3 and a 4-by-4')
testcase.verifyError(@() 1+1, ?MException) % No exception, test fails
I prefer the former, as it doesn't assume that if something goes wrong it went wrong in the way that I expected it to go wrong. But if all you care is that whatever operation you're testing didn't succeed that second approach could be useful.
0 comentarios
Más respuestas (0)
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Testing Frameworks en Help Center y File Exchange.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!